WHISTLE BLOWING: WHAT IS THE FATE OF WHISTLE BLOWERS?
![]() |
| GEOFFREY ONYEAMA |
Has
the “Whistle-blowing” policy of the Federal Government suffered a deathly blow?
Many
concerned Nigerians have begun to pick holes in the policy following reports of
victimization by “whistle blowers” by employers. But what has made it more
worrisome is the case of a staff of the Foreign Affairs Ministry who has been allegedly
relieved of his appointment.
When
the whistle-blowing policy was put in place three months ago, the hope was that
it would provide agencies like the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission
(EFCC) with actionable tips to track and recover stolen government funds. So
far, this appears to mostly be the case.
According
to the Minister for Information and Culture, Lai Mohammed in early February,
the government had recovered a total of $160m and N8bn with the aid of
informants who blew the whistle on alleged theft of public funds.
The
Minister said the looted funds, which did not include the $9.2 million in cash
allegedly owned by a former Group Managing Director of the Nigerian National
Petroleum Corporation, Mr. Andrew Yakubu, were recovered from just three
sources through whistle-blowers who he said gave actionable information to the Office
of the Minister of Justice and Attorney-General of the Federation, Mr. Abubakar
Malami (SAN).
He
said that the $9.2 million cash and others were also dividends of the
whistle-blower policy.
The
Minister had also encouraged Nigerians to support the policy pledging the
government's commitment to full protection and restitution for any informant
against harassment, intimidation or victimization.
This
has however turned out not to be the case as the policy has been hit with
controversy in recent times following the sack of Ntia Thompson, a
whistle-blower at the Federal Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Media
reports say Thompson was fired after sending a petition to the Economic and
Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, asking it to probe an allegation of fraud
involving some top officials of the Directorate of Technical Cooperation in
Africa, DTCA.
Mr.
Thompson, an Assistant Director with the DTCA in charge of the SERVICOM Unit,
who blew the lid on how $229,000 and N800, 000 were allegedly diverted, was
sacked on February 7.
Information
revealed that officials of the DTCA allegedly withdrew the money for the
celebration of the 10th anniversary of the NTCF, for which $36,852.00 was
allocated. The amount was also meant for the monitoring of various projects
executed from the Trust Fund across Africa.
About
N800,000 was also allegedly spent for SERVICOM “sensitization seminar” in the
Directorate.
Amid
concerns the funds may have been diverted, Mr. Thompson petitioned the EFCC to
investigate the allegation. He also petitioned the Police Inspector General,
Ibrahim Idris, expressing concerns about his safety.
The
anti-graft agency launched an investigation into the petition, but its effort
only resulted in compelling the officials to refund about N800, 000, PREMIUM
TIMES learnt.
Shortly
after, the DTCA management issued Mr. Thompson a query, accusing him of leaking
official information to the Commission and thus subjecting the agency to public
ridicule and embarrassment.
On
December 19, 2016, Mr. Thompson was served a suspension letter and, after two
months on suspension, he was sacked on February 7, 2017.
The
Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project, SERAP, waded into the issue
giving the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Geoffrey Onyeama, a seven-day ultimatum
to recall Mr. Thompson who was sacked after exposing a $229,000 fraud.
In an
open letter sent to Mr. Onyeama, SERAP requested the minister to use his
position to facilitate the immediate and unconditional reinstatement of Mr.
Thompson.
“By
sacking Mr. Thompson, your Ministry would seem to shield information on the
alleged fraud that the public has a right to know”.
“Therefore,
should you fail and/or neglect to act as requested within seven days after the receipt and/or publication
of this letter, SERAP will be compelled to pursue appropriate legal action
against your ministry to challenge the unfair treatment and victimization of Mr.
Thompson.”
The
letter, copied to Akinwumi Adesina, President of the AfDB, also reads in part: “We
also urge you to act swiftly to identify those involved in the alleged fraud
and hand them over to appropriate anti-corruption agencies for further
investigation and prosecution, as well as recover any stolen public funds”.
“Impunity
for reprisals against Mr. Thompson would send a message to all potential
whistle-blowers that your Ministry lacks the commitment to their protection”.
If
cases like Mr. Thompson's continue to dominate the headlines, then the
government should be prepared for the imminent failure of the whistle-blower
policy. The major attraction of the whistle-blowing policy, apart from the up
to 5% accrual to the whistle blower, is the anonymity promised by the
government”.
The
whistle blower doesn’t want to be known to avoid being persecuted and the case
of Mr. Thompson Ntia surely hasn't helped in encouraging other potential
whistle blowers to speak out.
But
whatever the case maybe, the government, must live by its words if it hopes to
encourage Nigerians to report financial and other related crimes to relevant
authorities.
Since
the whistle blower life is at risk if he cries out in situation whereby he
feels he’s been cheated, we hope that the Federal Ministry of Finance doesn’t
capitalize on this.
There
will be whistle blower inside whistle blower policy; we hope that those
managing the whistle blowing portal are trusted individuals so that the life of
a successful whistle blower isn’t exposed to further danger as a result of leak
of information regarding the original whistle blower.
The
whistle blowing policy will only be successful if the government continues to
fulfill its promise, and if the continued 100% protection of the whistle blower
is sustained.

No comments:
Drop Comment